🔧 Initial dev copy from live
This commit is contained in:
25
tests/test_issue_code_syntax_highlight.py
Normal file
25
tests/test_issue_code_syntax_highlight.py
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||
"""Regression tests for fenced code block syntax highlighting."""
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
UI_JS = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent / "static" / "ui.js"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _read_ui_js() -> str:
|
||||
return UI_JS.read_text()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_fenced_code_blocks_add_prism_language_class():
|
||||
js = _read_ui_js()
|
||||
assert 'class="language-${esc(normalizedLang)}"' in js, (
|
||||
"Fenced code blocks should add Prism language-* classes so syntax highlighting works"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_fenced_code_blocks_keep_existing_pre_header_layout():
|
||||
js = _read_ui_js()
|
||||
assert 'return `${h}<pre><code${langAttr}>${esc(code.replace(/\\n$/,' in js, (
|
||||
"The syntax-highlight fix should preserve the existing fenced code block layout"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert '<div class="code-block">' not in js, (
|
||||
"This fix should not introduce a new wrapper around fenced code blocks"
|
||||
)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user